The Message 7
The Message 7
"Would the real, the real Great Britain step
forward!"
How do we view our American cousins? One of the most
enduring stereotypes is one of brashness, and a tendency to be a bit 'over the
top,' with a tendency not to shy away from doing things on a massive scale.
Certainly over the past few years this has certainly been true of the music.
Eminem, Marilyn, Fred Durst, Andrew WK, Kid Rock. All of these are larger than
life, cartoon characters, none are above shock tactics to get noticed. Cast as
agent provocateurs of youth rebellion by the moral majoritarians, these artists
in fact, generally have no real subversive message. However the scale on which
these 'subversive' artists and movements exist could be a lesson to the
alternative music scene in this country. We can learn from them despite their
tendency to the lowest common demoniator, with bands like Alien Ant Farm and
Puddle of Mudd peddling boring and only vaguely evolved white-trash rock.
The reason we can learn from all this is that British
alternative music creeping out from our own underground ghetto has done so
under cover of blandness. Travis, Coldplay, Starsailor and now Haven; decent
bands all but ultimately bands that shake up nothing apart from the occasional
floppy barnet while playing AOR on Jools Holland.
So, what's my point? Well, in a nutshell, it is that
maybe by our deference to the Americans to provide us with rebellion we are
underestimating our own capacities as a country to make our own. Put simply,
we're better at it. When we take a chance on outspoken, larger than life
characters and audacious music, we create a legacy. At the moment there are no
signs of this occurring any time soon.
When British alternative music comes out of its shell
it does so making a statement, yet often successfully preserving its
credibility and intelligence. Due to this any rebellion it may encourage is
genuine and truly challenging; the social and political rebellion of punk, the
lifestyle rebellion of rave culture and its descendents, all of this has made a
difference to music, to youth culture and to the attitudes of the authorities
on various issues.
Looking at this, reluctantly, from a business point of
view, it makes even more sense. The role of labels is, to paraphrase the Clash,
to turn rebellion into money. Major labels brought punk to the masses, so no
doubt punk lined a few suit pockets along the way. Eventually this dilutes the
effect of whatever movement it is bringing towards the mainstream, but the
difference has often already been made.
However, the lack of challenging or subversive music,
figures or movements in this country is not solely due to the industry. Delving
into the underground indie, punk or dance scenes does not reveal the materials
for rebellion. This is bizarre as its not like we live in a utopia in Great
Britain. Injustice is rife, a stagnant political environment exists, and there
are numerous social problems. Despite all this, the kids seem apathetic. They
might just want to dance, but the dancing of Britain's youth caused a seismic
shift in attitudes in the late 80s so why not again? It would be more than
welcome in the current branded, homogenous, stifling cultural climate.
The authorities must secretly love the American
alternative, because I'm at a loss to see how Fred Durst and his ilk can be
considered a threat to the normal order. I suppose no true rebellion can centre
on ten year olds, after all. On the other hand, the youth of Britain have
proved to be masters of subversion in the past, and now I feel we must again.
So c'mon kids, burn those brand name t-shirts, get
your arses off the sofa and make a noise the man will want to ban.
CHRIS STANLEY
Comments
Post a Comment